Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Executed contracts don’t come with erase marks.  This decision in the case of SRO Development LLC v. 46 Seagrass LLC reinforces that deeds must conform to the P&S. The case highlights the real risks that arise when boundary changes and approvals occur after a deal is struck.

In the Superior Court decision where the Seller reduced the property parcel size before closing, Noel noted the case serves as a reminder that property boundaries are not a moving target. Once a P&S is executed, that deed must conform to the deal struck, not the deal later envisioned.

“It also underscores the danger of proceeding with contracts before title and land use approvals are fully aligned,” Di Carlo said. A timely takeaway for buyers, sellers, and practitioners navigating today’s increasingly complex real estate landscape."

Disclaimer: Usage of This Website Does Not Make Us Your Lawyer
Usage of this website shall not create or constitute a "lawyer/client relationship" or serve as a basis for a claim against Warshaw, Di Carlo & Poncia, P.C. Information on this website is provided for the convenience of the firm's clients and other interested users and cannot be relied upon as being correct, complete, up to date or applicable to the user’s personal situation or question. Nothing on this website should be relied upon by the user or shall constitute legal advice. Only a face-to-face private consultation with an attorney can provide reliable legal advice and properly address a user’s personal situation or needs. 

Web site designed and developed by Hungry Bird Creative Group.